Politicians
and religious leaders invariably state with
certainty that their beliefs and
preachings are the absolute truth. Guest blogger ANDY FLEMING investigates
knowledge and certainty, and in the process reveals how a society that
dispenses with true scientific scepticism inevitably ends in tragedy.
All of my
life I've been fascinated by science, and although I'm not a scientist (I was
however a laboratory analyst at ICI for many years, and I am an amateur
astronomer) I still consider science to be the best human method for explaining
how we, and the entire cosmos came to be. Unlike many other areas of human
endeavour such as religion, our scientific theories, although still only
approximate descriptions of reality, are testable, falsifiable and most
importantly, can be verified by peer review. This cannot be said of many other
academic disciplines, as instead of logical, rational thought, they rely on
each individual's belief systems and their hypotheses are hence not testable in
the real world.
Humankind's
scientific theories are however, at best only approximations of reality, albeit
often exquisitely accurate approximations. Over decades and centuries they have
been developed and amended in the light of better data and evidence. For
example Newton's Laws of Motion and Universal Gravitation were perfectly
adequate up to 1915, and indeed are still used in determining a spacecraft's
trajectory. Such an example is NASA/JPL's's New Horizons mission to Pluto, due
to arrive with perfect accuracy to the nearest second at that distant dwarf
planet in 2015. However, Sir Isaac Newton cannot be placed in the driver's seat
in very strong gravitational fields or at relativistic velocities (speeds
approaching that of light), due to effects including time dilation and Lorentz
length contractions. And Newton’s speculative contention that
time is a universal constant was proved incorrect by Einstein. It is the speed
of light that is a universal constant.